| So how do the UFO debunkers do it? How do they | | | | science; it's just a bunch of bunk -- which is why the |
| practice the fine art of debunkery? How do they | | | | debunkers must debunk it. If it's no big deal, then it's not |
| attempt to bamboozle us into their demented views? | | | | even real. He will passionately ridicule the UFO nut and |
| Or can they? Many ET and UFO believers are | | | | make him feel stupid for his beliefs, making him feel he |
| impervious to their conniving ploys. But there are still | | | | has no leg to stand on. He may take some minute |
| some gullible folks out there, ready to be hoodwinked. | | | | detail or possible flaw in a particular UFO case and |
| There are various techniques those sly shysters use | | | | expounds on it, making it deflate the whole story. He |
| to hornswoggle his gullible victims. Debunkers will claim | | | | will discuss several fraud cases, such as exposed |
| their research and information they give are based on | | | | hoaxes, so to put holes in the whole UFO |
| actual "facts" concerning the non-existence of UFOs | | | | phenomenon. |
| or ETs. These "facts" make their case against UFOs | | | | Researchers and reporters of UFO cases are ridiculed |
| sound reliable; hence, the UFO witnesses or believers | | | | and discredited, hence, weakening the public's view of |
| only have mere unsubstantiated claims. | | | | them. Debunkers will claim these journalistic scoundrels |
| But it's funny how people liberally use the word "facts," | | | | just do it for the money regardless of the truth. But |
| because quite often this word actually means "fiction." | | | | perhaps the reverse is true; the debunker is actually |
| But when you broadcast a big fat hairy lie, you have to | | | | describing himself! |
| call it a fact, because the tactic is to convince people | | | | Debunkers often declare that it's absurd to believe that |
| of -- yes, the "facts." Therefore, the eyewitnesses' | | | | extraterrestrials exist, or that life thrives on other |
| "claims" of evidence regarding UFOs becomes the | | | | planets, because there is no real evidence or proof. |
| fiction. This is a world where facts become lies and lies | | | | They say that evolution teaches that life is a fluke, so |
| become facts. | | | | it's a wonder it even sprung up on Earth. They ridicule |
| A haughty condescending attitude makes the | | | | the concept of any kind of life beyond our world. But |
| debunker seem superior over the UFO crackpots. | | | | another reason that extraterrestrials can't exist is |
| Especially when they claim God is on their side. They | | | | because they aren't part of the plan of salvation, |
| use the premise that absence of evidence is evidence | | | | according to some Christian groups, and naturally |
| for absence." If he sees nothing there, it must not be | | | | debunkers use this tactic. But if aliens do exist, would |
| anywhere. Therefore, there can never be any real | | | | that make Christians responsible for their salvation |
| evidence, because UFOs really don't exist, so any | | | | too? Quite a hefty weight on their broad shoulders, |
| alleged evidence must be unreliable or fabricated. So | | | | eh? |
| any such evidence must be flawed or incorrect in | | | | The debunker is a clever scoundrel, and they succeed |
| some way, so leave it to the debunker to find out | | | | at proliferating disinformation into the usual channels of |
| what that flaw is! Usually, the debunker claims that the | | | | UFO information, essentially to confuse people, so that |
| eyewitness is either mistaken about what he saw, | | | | they don't know what to believe anymore. So if they |
| was hallucinating, was mentally unstable, or was telling | | | | can't change our minds, they can at least confuse us |
| a tall tale -as in flat out lying to get attention. Many | | | | and plant seeds of doubt regarding the whole UFO |
| times these assumptions are in fact true - but not | | | | phenomenon. |
| always. | | | | So if you have listened to all the debunker |
| The debunker will trivialize any and all cases and | | | | disinformation and start saying, "Maybe all this UFO |
| eyewitness accounts, and the entire UFO | | | | stuff is just a bunch of hogwash after all," then does |
| phenomenon. He will make light of it and render it | | | | that mean they've gotten to you? God forbid! |
| ridiculous and absurd. After all, Ufology is not a valid | | | | |