Albert Einstein - Evidence of the Paranormal?

In this modern world of ours, it is easy to acceptmankind's understanding of the physical universe. And
science as our benefactor and religion as our enemy.equally famous as is Einstein's name is his formula: e =
All around us we continually see the miracles thatmc2. Einstein's name and formula are so well known, in
science and engineering provides us. But when we turnfact, that they have literally become synonymous; the
to religion, we experience few if any real miraclesmere mention of one immediately evokes the other.
ourselves. In place of the concrete evidence weWhat many high school students don't currently know,
desperately desire, we are generally told simply tohowever, is that Einstein's name, when translated using
accept hearsay, with the result that we are often leftthe letter meanings I identified, can only be described
with little reward to show for our faith. And all tooas miraculous. Using the letter meanings I identified,
often, in fact, we find ourselves feeling far moreEinstein's first name Albert can be translated as
confused by religion than enlightened."below surface round object, out of movement that"
Given this bias in favor of science over religion thatand his last name, Einstein, can be translated as "out of
appears to exist in our world today, is there anywithin related, c related c, that out of light related". The
reason for someone to believe that science's view ofsignificance of those translations may not be
the world might not be entirely accurate or complete?immediately obvious to you, so I will explain what they
Could our scientists possibly be overlooking somethingappear to represent.
rather peculiar and important about the way the worldBoth translations appear to be related to the physics
really works? Could there be a significant spiritual orof small particles. "Below surface round object", for
paranormal aspect to our existence that we haveexample, appears to be a description of an atom. "Out
somehow overlooked or that has intentionally beenof movement that" appears to be a reference to the
hidden from us?kinetic energy of the atom. "Out of within related"
I believe there is, and I believe that I have found someappears to be a description of mass, which is an
rather convincing evidence in support of that belief. Butintrinsic property of matter. "C related c" can be seen
the evidence I have to offer is not found in some sortas being equivalent to c2, and "that out of light related"
of proof of either extrasensory perception or ghosts.can be seen as indicating that the "c related c" has
Nor is it found in astrology, tarot cards, numerology orsomething to do with light and perhaps, even more
other, commonly alleged paranormal phenomena.specifically, to the movement of light. Taken together, in
Rather the evidence I have stumbled upon canfact, Albert Einstein's first name appears to accurately
incredibly be found within a single name: Albert Einstein.describe the left side of his famous equation while his
Obviously, this is going to take a bit of explaining.last name appears to accurately describe the right
A couple years ago I began to study the Englishside of the equation.
language in earnest. When I say "study", however, I doDo you find this amazing? I do.
not mean that I studied English grammar, compositionBut this apparent name identity correspondence
and/or etymology as one might typically do in highphenomenon is not at all limited to Einstein's name. I
school or college. Rather, I mean that I began to studyhave also found it applies to other names: George
English words as though they were from some sort ofGamow, Jerusalem, Chretien, Chernobyl, and numerous
ancient, as yet to be deciphered language, likeother names of people, places and even fictional
Mycenaean Linear A.characters. My Olin Revelation website, in fact, actually
And what I discovered through such research wasprovides translations--of admittedly varying degrees of
rather remarkable. Specifically, I discovered that eachapparent correspondence--for those and several
letter in the Latin alphabet (which is also the Englishhundred other names.
alphabet) appears to have a set of distinct meaningsOf course I recognize that all of the information that I
associated with it. While most linguists generallyhave just presented as well as that which can be
assume that a word like bridge is merely a randomfound on my website concerning this phenomenon
sequence of sounds and letters that, over time,does not exactly prove the validity of the letter
happened to become associated with a particularmeanings I have found. Critics will argue, and rightly so,
object, I found that the letters in words like bridge dothat the apparent accuracy of the letter meanings
not appear to be random at all; instead, the letters inmay simply be the result of pure chance and/or to
bridge and many words like it appear as if to haveperceptual biases akin to apophenia. For scientists to
been carefully chosen based on the meaningsactually accept such claims concerning the meaning of
associated with them.letters as true, the claims need to be rigorously tested.
As remarkable as those discoveries may sound, I alsoAnd that is, in fact, my hope. The claims I have made
discovered another rather curious phenomenon.can be disproved. By randomly assigning the meanings
Specifically, I found that, when names were translatedI have identified to completely different letters and then
based on their letter meanings, the resulting translationssynthesizing a set of translations that are equally
appeared to describe key events and/or otherconvincing as those found on my website, the
significant facts related to the people and placesassociation between the meanings I have identified and
named. And, as it happens, the name Albert Einsteinthe letters can be shown to be irrelevant.
illustrates that phenomenon extremely well.In the conflict between science and the paranormal,
Every high school student, of course, knows the namescience cannot always have the luxury of choosing its
Albert Einstein. Einstein was the physicist who camebattles. The gauntlet has been thrown down. Now I
up with the General Theory of Relativity, a theory thatthink that it is time for science to pick it up.
effectively rewrote the book when it came to